Performance

All the tests were done on an Arch Linux x86_64 machine with an Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU (1.90GHz).

Empirical likelihood computation

We show the performance of computing empirical likelihood with el_mean(). We test the computation speed with simulated data sets in two different settings: 1) the number of observations increases with the number of parameters fixed, and 2) the number of parameters increases with the number of observations fixed.

Increasing the number of observations

We fix the number of parameters at \(p = 10\), and simulate the parameter value and \(n \times p\) matrices using rnorm(). In order to ensure convergence with a large \(n\), we set a large threshold value using el_control().

library(ggplot2)
library(microbenchmark)
set.seed(3175775)
p <- 10
par <- rnorm(p, sd = 0.1)
ctrl <- el_control(th = 1e+10)
result <- microbenchmark(
  n1e2 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(100 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl),
  n1e3 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(1000 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl),
  n1e4 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(10000 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl),
  n1e5 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(100000 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl)
)

Below are the results:

result
#> Unit: microseconds
#>  expr        min         lq        mean      median         uq        max neval
#>  n1e2    450.109    478.643    515.5223    499.6675    544.877    624.775   100
#>  n1e3   1197.174   1391.245   1559.1280   1478.1020   1595.751   5148.543   100
#>  n1e4  10831.052  12287.334  14529.5187  14663.1955  15887.844  20104.350   100
#>  n1e5 163297.138 182993.601 212625.3866 204041.7260 244699.336 351749.136   100
#>  cld
#>  a  
#>  a  
#>   b 
#>    c
autoplot(result)
#> Warning: `aes_string()` was deprecated in ggplot2 3.0.0.
#> ℹ Please use tidy evaluation idioms with `aes()`.
#> ℹ See also `vignette("ggplot2-in-packages")` for more information.
#> ℹ The deprecated feature was likely used in the microbenchmark package.
#>   Please report the issue at
#>   <https://github.com/joshuaulrich/microbenchmark/issues/>.
#> This warning is displayed once every 8 hours.
#> Call `lifecycle::last_lifecycle_warnings()` to see where this warning was
#> generated.

Increasing the number of parameters

This time we fix the number of observations at \(n = 1000\), and evaluate empirical likelihood at zero vectors of different sizes.

n <- 1000
result2 <- microbenchmark(
  p5 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 5), ncol = 5),
    par = rep(0, 5),
    control = ctrl
  ),
  p25 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 25), ncol = 25),
    par = rep(0, 25),
    control = ctrl
  ),
  p100 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 100), ncol = 100),
    par = rep(0, 100),
    control = ctrl
  ),
  p400 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 400), ncol = 400),
    par = rep(0, 400),
    control = ctrl
  )
)

result2
#> Unit: microseconds
#>  expr        min          lq        mean     median          uq        max
#>    p5    738.107    766.2945    822.9004    794.717    844.7455   2290.302
#>   p25   2896.824   2927.6510   3093.2328   2952.457   3017.2880   7803.606
#>  p100  23305.801  25842.8630  28015.8194  26267.555  30879.3870  45904.884
#>  p400 266794.315 292779.0985 325835.2982 312984.546 348222.9735 457706.101
#>  neval cld
#>    100 a  
#>    100 a  
#>    100  b 
#>    100   c
autoplot(result2)

On average, evaluating empirical likelihood with a 100000×10 or 1000×400 matrix at a parameter value satisfying the convex hull constraint takes less than a second.